Evidence Observatory
Resumes statistics
The best-known resume statistics come from commercial publishers rather than from an academic literature, and are quoted without the sample sizes that would make them usable.
2 reviews · 2 sources
The measurement problem here
Resume claims tend to describe attention: how long a recruiter looks, what they look at, whether a document is read at all. Attention is genuinely hard to measure, which is why the small number of real studies here are eye-tracking experiments with modest samples rather than large surveys.
The recurring failure is dropping the sample size. A figure derived from thirty recruiters is a useful indication; quoted bare, it reads as a measured constant of the labour market.
The second failure is treating a description as advice. A study showing where attention falls during a first pass does not establish that changing a resume changes an outcome, and none of the studies we reviewed tested that.
Reviews
Recruiters spend only six seconds looking at a resume.
A real but small vendor eye-tracking study, describing an initial glance rather than total review time.
Resumes · 1 source · Reviewed 2026-08-22
Partially supportedIncluding a cover letter increases your chance of getting an interview.
One real field experiment supports tailored cover letters, but publishes no base rates.
Resumes · 1 source · Reviewed 2026-08-22
Partially supported
Published by Jobsearch.ing.